Capturing the world through photography, video and multimedia

March 1917: Billboards along W. 11th Street in Los Angeles. This is a tight crop of the following image to show the "Advertising War" billboard with a man reading newspaper before it.

PHOTOGRAPH BY: Los Angeles Times

March 1917: Billboards along W. 11th Street in Los Angeles.

PHOTOGRAPH BY: Los Angeles Times

March 1917: Sunset Park (now Lafayette Recreation Center) is hidden by billboards along W. 6th Street. This photo was published in the March 18, 1917, Los Angeles Times.

PHOTOGRAPH BY: Los Angeles Times

March 1917: A string of billboards at the intersection of 18th Street and Figueroa Street blocks scenery. This photo was published in this unusual shape in the March 24, 1917, Los Angeles Times.

PHOTOGRAPH BY: Los Angeles Times

March 1917: Billboards on Vermont Avenue near Wilshire Boulevard. This photo was published in the March 18, 1917, Los Angeles Times.

PHOTOGRAPH BY: Los Angeles Times

More galleries on Framework

return to gallery

1917 billboard war

The London Bridge moves to Lake Havasu City

Oct. 10, 1971: The London Bridge is dedicated at its new home at Lake Havasu City, Ariz. Bought in 1968, the bridge pieces were shipped from London and reassembled. ...   View Post»


1917 billboard war

Review: Nokia Lumia 1020

The Nokia Lumia 1020 has some impressive stats. The most notable to the consumer is the whopping 41megapixels. The smart camera mantra includes the tag line, "Take...   View Post»


1917 billboard war

Pictures in the News | Feb. 28, 2012

In today's selection of Pictures in the News: Thousands of military officers are commissioned in South Korea; firefighters extinguish flames in the Beloselsky-Belozersky Palace...   View Post»


Richland Farms

Richland Farms | A rural oasis in a gritty urban landscape

Just south of downtown Los Angeles, Compton’s 10-block Richland Farms neighborhood — zoned for agricultural use — is an unlikely rural oasis in the middle of a gritty...   View Post»

1917 billboard war

On Jan. 15, 1917, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago that a city may prohibit billboards in residential districts in the interest of safety, morality, health, and decency of the community.

The Los Angeles Times soon campaigned for a similar ordinance in Los Angeles. Photographers were dispatched to document offending billboards around the city.

Under the headline: “Immediate Passage of Ordinance to Rid the Residence Sections of the City of Dangerous Eyesores is Urged by Civil Organizations,” a March 18, 1917, Los Angeles Times story began:

The ninety-day “survey” of the billboard situation, so urgently advocated by the billboard men and their allies in and out of the City Council, may never take place. The people of Los Angeles, electrified by the discovery that there is a way to get rid of the billboard nuisance once and for all, are mobilizing for a grand spring drive on the glaring chromes that deface the residence districts, and neither delay nor red tape is likely to be permitted to stand in the way of their campaign.

The public had grown so accustomed to being flaunted by the billboard interests and so resigned to the belief that the law somehow was against the home owner when it came to the question of curbing this disgraceful business, that the recent United States Supreme Court decision giving cities the right to absolutely to prohibit billboards in residence sections was the cause of genuine astonishment. This astonishment has given way to a spirit of determination, which is manifesting itself in a clamorous demand upon the city authorities for immediate and unceremonious action against the professional city defacers.

Several local civic organizations addressed resolutions to the City Council during the past week demanding the passage of the anti-billboard ordinance that is now being framed by the City Attorney. These included the City Planning Association, the Southern California Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, the Architects’ and Engineers’ Association and others.

Billboard owners fought back campaigning hard against the proposed ordinance – claiming on one photographed billboard:

Advertising War
Certain newspapers vs. the billboards.
Billboards help build up big industries.
Why allow the newspapers to kill the billboards?
Certain Newspapers want an advertising monopoly.

Of course the Los Angeles Times photograph shows a man reading a newspaper underneath the billboard.

The billboard ordinance took over a year to be passed. A small story in the June 25, 1918, Los Angeles Times reported:

When the City Council yesterday by unanimous vote made a few changes in the billboard ordinance, George W. Kleiser, president of the Foster & Kleiser Company, which recent purchased the interests of the Thomas H.B. Barney Company, gave the assurance that every billboard will be removed from the residential districts within sixty days. Those that are objectionable in the semi-business districts, he said, will be eliminated within four months.

1 Comment

  1. April 26, 2013, 7:07 am

    Commercial blight indeed. And now, 95 years later we fight electronic signs in our neighborhoods.

    By: greytv

Add a comment or a question.

If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate. Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.


Required, will not be published